Marijuana
site map
Support Marijuana City Sponsors
 
Advertisers
· Monster Smoke Shop
· Herbal Smoke Shop
· Herbal Vaporizer
· Weed Forums
· Legal Bud
· Herbal Vaporizers
· 420 Clothing
· Buy Cannabis Seeds
· Weed Shirts
· Cheapest Online Headshop
· Vaporizer Shop
· How To Grow Marijuana
· Marijuana T Shirts
· Weed T-Shirts
· Marijuana Forums
· Herbal Vaporizer
· Legal Highs
· Medical Cannabis Seeds
· Marijuana Strain Tees
· How To Grow Weed
· Marijuana Recipes
· Herbal Smoke Shop
· Cheap Cannabis Seeds
· Marijuana Seeds
· Cannabis Seeds
· 420
· Medical Marijuana Recipes
· Cooking Weed
· Weed Recipes
· Legal Buds
· Marijuana Recipes
· Medical Marijuana






click here
Advertise!
Advertise on the internets most powerul network of 420 sites! Click here for more details.
Site Links
Marijuana City
· Marijuana Forum
· Marijuana Dictionary
· Marijuana Chat
· Marijuana Webcams
· Marijuana Pics
· Pot Blogs
· Marijuana Links
· Pot Surveys
· Marijuana Downloads
· Invite A Friend!
· Marijuana Singles

420 City
· Marijuana News
· Submit News
· News Archive
· Search News
· Marijuana PDA News
· Marijuana Dating

Shop our Sponsors
· Sex Pheromones
· Potent Legal Smokes
· Herb Grinders
· Solid Smokes
· HerbalSmokeShop.com
· Smoking Oils
· Clear Rolling Papers
· Herbal Vaporizer
· Herbal Highs
· Legal Highs
· Herbal Smoke Shop
· Herbal Mood Pills
· Best Herbal Smoke
· Hawaiian Gold Bud
· Blueberry Bud
· Herbal Vaporizer

Member Links
· Your Account
· Marijuana City Home
· 420City Home
· Pot Homepage
· Contact Marijuana City

420 Dating
· Create a Profile

Shout Box

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.
Sponsors
Support Our Sponsors
herbalsmokeshop.com
Legal Buds
Vaporizer
Smoke Shop
Herbal Smoke
Herb Vaporizer
Quick Pot Links
Legal Bud Video
Legal Buds Video
Legal Bud
Extreme Vaporizer
Volcano Vaporizer
Herbal Vaporizer
How to Roll A Joint
marijuana strains
marijuana slang
marijuana pictures
marijuana bud pics
marijuana plant pics
marijuana growing pics
marijuana posters pics
marijuana humor pics
pot humor pics
grow pot
Member Panel
Nickname:

Password:

Online Now
Guests: 35
Members: 0
Total: 35

49466 Total Members


Anonymous User
Join Now!
Marijuana Forum

 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 Federal Laws prohibits only infants from growing WEED!!!! View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
jglee430
Super Toker
Super Toker


Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:02 am Reply with quoteBack to top

§ 8. ‘‘Person’’, ‘‘human being’’, ‘‘child’’, and‘‘individual’’ as including born-alive infant

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words ‘‘person’’, ‘‘human being’’,‘‘child’’, and ‘‘individual’’, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development. 1 USC 8

“Include (Lat. Inclaudere, to shut in, keep within.) To confine within, hold as in an inclosure, take in, attain, shut up, contain,inclose, comprise, comprehend, embrace, involve.” –Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition


“include …. Foreign phrases: In eo quod plus sit semperinest et minus. The less is always included in the greater. Inclusio unius estexclusio alterius. The inclusion of one thing is the exclusion ofanother.” -FromThe Free Legal Dictionary by Farlex

The word “include” in legal terminology is restricted to what is mentioned except when the phrase “including but not limited” is used. According to the Cannon of Construction, this word does not open to a thing or person that is not mentioned in the sentence.

In GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454) 545 U.S. 1 (2005), Respondents Raich and Monson who California residents did not rebutted the presumption that they were under 18 years old. The federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) regulate control substance for anyone who is an infant that grow marijuana. Since they did not rebut this presumption that they were under 18, the US Supreme Court ruling did not limit the prohibition to grow weed to under 18 years old.

If they rebut they were not an infant, the US Supreme Court may have ruled that Congress have the right to regulate a class of intrastate commerce by caused infants that affect interstate commerce. The US Supreme Court may have ruled that adults in California have the right to grow marijuana and the CSA only applies to infants. And Congress did not have authority to regulate ADULT intrastate or interstate commerce under the US Code 1 USC 8.

This is the funniest discovery I made today!! Have a good laugh!!! Very Happy
View user's profileSend private message
jglee430
Super Toker
Super Toker


Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:00 am Reply with quoteBack to top

All Crimes are Commercial

The freeman and sovereign citizens are right about all crimes are commercial. I able to verified this theory by studying federal and state laws. In most state statutes, it defines a person as a corporation or association with a human being. The corporation, association, or other business legal entities are in commerce. If a human being who is attached to the legal entity commits a crime, then the crime is considered commercial because the legal entity is doing business.

Many freeman and sovereign citizens applies legal theories of rebutting the Strawman or TIN man by paperwork or court litigation. These theories are not crystal clear. Why rebut the TIN man or the Strawman when a live man can rebut the legal entity that is shown in federal and state law books?

It is a better legal strategy to rebut the legal entity than rebutting the TIN or Strawman at first. The human being, individual, man, woman, or child must be attached to the legal entity and the act must be performed before the act is considered a crime.

In the Federal Law books there are two definitions of persons. One is the infant and the other is individuals with a legal entities. If you combine these two definition together, you will find the person is a legal entity (i.e. corporation, association, Limited Liability Company, etc.) with a child. When the infant commits the crime, the child and the legal entity is liable under federal laws. An infant without a legal entity doesn’t violate the federal laws when they perform the same act. This same principle applies to adult, or child and legal entities under state laws.

Courts Presume Legal Entity
If you don’t rebut the legal entity and you said you “understand” the charges, you accepted false facts and the court presume that you had a legal entity attached to you when the crime was committed. The false facts are that you are attached, hired, or employed by the legal entity when the crime is committed.
Prostitution and Drug Possession Loopholes
I exposed the loopholes in state laws concerning prostitution and drug possession in the website Sugar Citizens Movement. Before using the loophole defense, it is a good idea to rebut the presumption of the corporation, association, or other business entity. The prostitution laws and drug possession are written in many states to criminalize someone for engaging in these activities when the human is hired, employed, and/or owned by the corporation. It may not be necessary to use the loopholes as a defense.

Legal Terminology

“Include (Lat. Inclaudere, to shut in, keep within.) To confine within, hold as in an inclosure, take in, attain, shut up, contain, inclose, comprise, comprehend, embrace, involve.” –Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition
“include …. Foreign phrases: In eo quod plus sit semper inest et minus.The less is always included in the greater. Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. The inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of another.” -From The Free Legal Dictionary by Farlex
The word “include” in legal terminology is restricted to what is mentioned except when the phrase “including but not limited” is used. According to the Cannon of Construction, this word does not open to a thing or person that is not mentioned in the sentence.
“Well …… well as 1. In additional too: the museum provides hours of fun and a few surprises as well | a shop that sold books as well as newspaper. …” –The Oxford American College Dictionary
Corporations are not same as Limited Liability Company (LLC). Corporations require to have a board of directors under law. LLC is not required to have a board of directors.

Arizona
1-215. Definitions
28. "Person" includes a corporation, company, partnership, firm, association or society, as well as a natural person. When the word "person" is used to designate the party whose property may be the subject of a criminal or public offense, the term includes the United States, this state, or any territory, state or country, or any political subdivision of this state that may lawfully own any property, or a public or private corporation, or partnership or association. When the word "person" is used to designate the violator or offender of any law, it includes corporation, partnership or any association of persons.

Connecticut
“(k) The words “person” and “another” may extend and be applied to communities, companies, corporations, public or private, limited liability companies, societies and associations.” –Sec. 1-1
“Except where different meanings are expressly specified, the following terms have the following meanings when used in this title: (1) “Person” means a human being, and, where appropriate, a public or private corporation, a limited liability company, an unincorporated association, a partnership, a government or a governmental instrumentality; “ -Connecticut Penal Code Sec. 53a-3. Definitions.
“Appropriate. To make a things one’ s own; to make a thing the subject of property;” –Black’s Law 6th edition.
Note: Connecticut statutes require the human being to be owned by one of the legal entities.

Georgia

Ҥ 16-2-1. "Crime" defined
(a) A "crime" is a violation of a statute of this state in which there is a joint operation of an act or omission to act and intention or criminal negligence.
(b) Criminal negligence is an act or failure to act which demonstrates a willful, wanton, or reckless disregard for the safety of others who might reasonably be expected to be injured thereby.” - O.C.G.A. § 16-2-1
Note: Georgia requires two or more persons in operation to be considered a crime.

Florida
(3).The word “person” includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations.
Note: The word “and” means that all things these legal entities listed.

Illinois
(720 ILCS 5/2-2) (from Ch. 38, par. 2-2)
Sec. 2-2. "Act".
"Act" includes a failure or omission to take action.

(720 ILCS 5/2-10) (from Ch. 38, par. 2-10)
Sec. 2-10. "Includes".
"Includes" or "including" means comprehending among other particulars, without limiting the generality of the foregoing word or phrase.

Note: Foregoing means before the “include” word. It doesn’t mean whatever after the “include” word is generality of the foregoing word or phrase. So not doing the act is the crime.

Massachusetts
Section 7. In construing statutes the following words shall have the meanings herein given, unless a contrary intention clearly appears:
Twenty-third, "Person'' or "whoever'' shall include corporations, societies, associations and partnerships.

Ohio
1.59 Statutory definitions.
(C) "Person" includes an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, and association.
Note: The word “and” means that all things these legal entities listed.


Oklahoma
O.S. §21 105
Person defined.
The word “person” includes corporations, as well as natural persons.
O.S. § 21 106
Where the term “person” is used in this chapter to designate the party whose property may be the subject of any offense, it includes this state, any other state, government or country which may lawfully own any property within this state, and all public and private corporations or joint associations, as well as individuals.

South Dakota

22-1-2. Definition of terms. Terms used in this title mean:
(2) "Actor," the person who takes the active part in a transaction;
(31) "Person," any natural person, unborn child, association, limited liability company, corporation, firm, organization, partnership, or society. If the term is used to designate a party whose property may be the subject of a crime or petty offense, it also includes the United States, any other country, this state, and any other state or territory of the United States, and any of their political subdivisions, agencies, or corporations;
Note: If property is used in a crime, then the governments of the US are the entities in the person that is are responsible because they are parts of the person who commit the crime. Two examples are drug dealing and prostitution.
Please also visit my website to find out about drug and prostitution laws loopholes.
[url]
www.sugarcitizens.net[/url]
View user's profileSend private message
jglee430
Super Toker
Super Toker


Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:40 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Even if it is used in the expansive context, that must be contain in the action or thing. For example. "My dad was included in the dinner." The dad cannot be missing from the dinner.

In 1 USC Section 8, the "person" must contains the infant. Can adult be part of the person in the expansive context? Yes!! The adult must be with an infant to be the person in 1 USC Section 8. 1 USC 1 is dealing with legal entities and not human being.

Cannon of Construction limits to the restrictive sense. The only ways to defeat the cannons is to use the words "including" or "include but not limited to." Unless it is defined differently in the statutes, it default to the Cannon of Constructions.

I don't go by others opinion. I go by what is found in legal dictionaries and legal usage books that are accepted by the legal community. If an attorney wants to override the accepted legal dictionary definition, then they should write a journal article and get it published by a ABA accredited law school. The law school will peer review their research. Anyone can give bad advice. Opinions are b*llshit when it is contradictory legal dictionaries that is accepted by the legal community and without a journal article.
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic

Support Marijuana City Sponsors

 Jump to:   



View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum